Tucker Carlson Exposes the Irresponsible Use of CV-19 Vaccines

We reproduce below the transcript of a video interview of Tucker Carlson in which he provides wealth of information to expose the fact that COVID-19 and the associated vaccines were merely a hoax and part of a sinister Globalist Agenda to drastically reduce the population of the world in favour of the wealthy elite.

This has very serious implications for India since our government has gone overboard in forcing this harmful vaccination on the people of India.

 The video version of this article can be found at https://rumble.com/v1e9x77-tucker-carlson-fauci-brix-booom-deutsche-untertitel.html

Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson (born May 16, 1969) is an American television host, conservative political commentator and author who has hosted the nightly political talk show ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ on Fox News since 2016. Tucker Carlson Tonight is an American talk show and current affairs program hosted by conservative commentator Tucker Carlson on the television network Fox News. The show premiered in November 2016 and includes political commentary, monologues, interviews, and analysis, similar to Fox News’ On the Record. Tucker Carlson argues on the show that no one benefited more from the COVID pandemic than China.  

Carlson began his media career in the 1990s, writing for The Weekly Standard and other publications. He was a CNN commentator from 2000 to 2005 and a co-host of the network’s prime-time news debate program Crossfire from 2001 to 2005. From 2005 to 2008, he hosted the nightly program Tucker on MSNBC. He has been a political analyst for Fox News since 2009, appearing as guest or guest host on various programs before the launch of his current show.

Interviewer: The New York Times just did a study about menstruation cycles and how that is affected by vaccines.

Dr. Anthony Fauci

Anthony Fauci: Yeah, well, the menstrual thing is something that seems to be quite transient and temporary. That’s the point. We need to study it more. 

Fox News host Tucker Carlson reflects on Dr. Fauci’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ on July 31, 2022.

Tucker Carlson: We need to study it more? Human fertility, reproducing the species is the most important event in most people’s lives. Do we merely need to study it more? Oh, but it’s too late. We just forced millions of women to take that drug. So how did they release a vaccine and then make it mandatory when they didn’t understand the long term effects of the drug? That’s a very good question. 

Tucker Carlson also commented on a recent interview by Deborah Birx. Birx told Fox News that she thought the vaccine was overplayed.  Dr. Deborah Birx, COVID-19 response coordinator under former President Donald Trump, didn’t mince words as she spoke recently of the messaging around COVID-19 vaccines. Birx specializes in HIV/AIDS immunology, vaccine research, and global health. Birx appeared on Fox News on July 22, 2022, the day after President Joe Biden tested positive for COVID-19. Host Neil Cavuto asked Birx what she would say to unvaccinated people who question the need to get vaccinated when vaccinated people like Biden are catching the coronavirus.

Dr. Deborah Birx

Birx responded by touting the merits of testing and Paxlovid, the antiviral used to treat COVID-19 infections. She still recommended folks get vaccinated, but she also made a statement about vaccine communication that got plenty of people talking.

“I think we overplayed the vaccines, and it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization. It will,” Birx said. 

Some social media users are taking that comment out of context, with one viral Facebook post suggesting it shows she “changed her story” on the efficacy of vaccines. “Birx admits vaccines don’t work,” read the text across the screen as Goulet cut to a clip of Birx making the statement about “overplaying the vaccines.”

Here are her comments in full:

Neil Cavuto

Cavuto: I did want to get your take — a lot of people looking at the president having (COVID-19). And a lot of people vaxxed and boosted and they’re getting it. The 20% of Americans who have not been vaccinated might look at that and say, ‘Why bother? Why bother?’ What do you tell them?

Birx: If you’re across the South and you’re in the middle of this wave, what is going to save you is Paxlovid. But once we get through this wave, during that lull, you should get vaccinated and boosted, because we do believe it will protect you, particularly if you’re over 70. I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection. I think we overplayed the vaccines, and it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization. 

It will. But let’s be very clear, 50% of the people who died from the omicron surge were older and vaccinated. Even if you’re vaccinated and boosted, if you’re unvaccinated, right now, the key is testing and Paxlovid. It’s effective, it’s a great antiviral. And really it’s what’s going to save your lives right now if you’re over 70.

Tucker Carlson (commenting on Deborah Birx’s interview on his show ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ on July 31, 2022.): Quote: “I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection.” Really Deborah Birx?! But somehow you forgot to mention that as people were being fired from their jobs for not taking this on the premise that if they took it they would never be infected. When you get criminally charged? Soon, we hope.

And then there’s the effect of the COVID vaccines on the elderly, the population most at risk. According to the Lancet, vaccinated people around Joe Biden’s age are 80% more likely to become sick after taking the COVID shot as compared to unvaccinated people. How is this not a banner headline? It’s being ignored. A scientist wrote in The Journal of Virology, “The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals eight months after the administration of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.” 

So it’s not just that your natural antibodies were more powerful than the vaccine. We’ve known that for a long time, though they lied about it. Turns out the vaccine appears to depress your immune system. This has massive implications, not just for COVID. There are all kinds of horrible diseases you can get with a suppressed immune system.
The reference Tucker Carlson made is from Virology Journal’s article titled ‘Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them’ by Kenji Yamamoto. Following is an excerpt from the same article.

The study reveals that the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to the widespread use of genetic vaccines, including mRNA and viral vector vaccines. In addition, booster vaccines have been used, but their effectiveness against the highly mutated spike protein of Omicron strains is limited. Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among unvaccinated individuals. 

These findings were more pronounced in older adults and individuals with pre-existing conditions. According to the European Medicines Agency’s recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.

The spike proteins present on exosomes circulate throughout the body for more than 4 months. Newly generated antibodies of the spike protein damage the cells and tissues that are primed to produce spike proteins, and vascular endothelial cells are damaged by spike proteins in the bloodstream; this may damage the immune system organs such as the adrenal gland.

As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued. In addition, the date of vaccination and the time since the last vaccination should be recorded in the medical record of patients. Owing to the lack of awareness of this disease group among physicians and the general public in Japan, a history of COVID-19 vaccination is often not documented, as it is in the case of influenza vaccination. The time elapsed since the last COVID-19 vaccination may need to be considered when invasive procedures are required. Several practical measures that can be implemented to prevent a decrease in immunity have been reported.

To date, when comparing the advantages and disadvantages of mRNA vaccines, vaccination has been commonly recommended. As the COVID-19 pandemic becomes better controlled, vaccine sequelae are likely to become more apparent. It has been hypothesized that there will be an increase in cardiovascular diseases, especially acute coronary syndromes, caused by the spike proteins in genetic vaccines. Besides the risk of infections owing to lowered immune functions, there is a possible risk of unknown organ damage caused by the vaccine that has remained hidden without apparent clinical presentations, mainly in the circulatory system. Therefore, careful risk assessments prior to surgery and invasive medical procedures are essential. Randomized controlled trials are further needed to confirm these clinical observations.

In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination is a major risk factor for infections in critically ill patients.

Tucker Carlson: The Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology found the same thing: “Vaccination induces a profound impairment in type one interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.” What the hell? And yet these people are on TV blindly admitting we should do more study on that, after we forced it on the entire American population and billions of people globally!

Excerpt from the Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology. 

The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent. The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. 

Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health.

There has been an unwavering message about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 from the public health apparatus in the US and around the globe. The efficacy is increasingly in doubt, as shown in a recent letter to the Lancet Regional Health by Günter Kampf (2021b). Kampf provided data showing that the vaccinated are now as likely as the unvaccinated to spread disease. He concluded: “It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.”

Moreover, the inadequacy of phase I, II, and III trials to evaluate mid-term and long-term side effects from mRNA genetic vaccines may have been misleading on their suppressive impact on the innate immunity of the vaccines.

In the end, billions of lives are potentially at risk, given the large number of individuals injected with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines and the broad range of adverse outcomes we have described. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly. Furthermore, we encourage all individuals to make their own health care decisions with this information as a contributing factor in those decisions.

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top